Insights

Chiropractor's registration cancelled after a criminal conviction and a finding of misconduct

Insurance Law & Litigation

The NSW Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) has been successful in applying to the Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) to find a chiropractor guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct, with subsequent cancellation of his registration.

Disciplinary proceedings were taken against former chiropractor, Mr James Ellis Hopper (Practitioner), in the Tribunal on 12 February 2018. The proceedings arose from a complaint by the HCCC that the Practitioner, under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) (National Law),should be found guilty of Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct and Professional Misconduct after having been convicted of a criminal offence in relation to treatment he provided to a patient.

Background to the Tribunal

In 2015, the police charged the Practitioner with inappropriate touching of a patient. It was alleged by the patient that the Practitioner had offered her a remedial massage and during this, the Practitioner unnecessarily removed all of the patient's clothing and failed to adequately cover her. He was then alleged to have touched her external genitalia and breasts numerous times during the treatment, and concluded the treatment by offering the patient words to the effect of a "happy ending". The situation was also unusual as the Practitioner did not ordinarily perform remedial massage, particularly on this patient who had already been treated by the Practitioner on 53 occasions over a period of four years.

The Practitioner denied these allegations. He conceded that he may have touched the patient's genitals and breasts, however, it was not intentional, rather, incidental to the treatment, or accidental. Accordingly, he entered a not guilty plea.

In 2016, the Magistrate's Court found the Practitioner guilty of inappropriately touching the patient. The Magistrate did not accept the Practitioner's submissions and found that the amount of contact he had with the patient was beyond what would be accepted as "accidental". Further, when considering his actions in its entirety, it was clear that his conduct was inappropriate. The Practitioner was convicted of a criminal offence and ordered to perform 200 hours of community service.

Professional Misconduct proceedings brought by the HCCC

In February 2018, the HCCC brought proceedings against the Practitioner in the Tribunal, claiming that he was guilty of Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct and Professional Misconduct. The HCCC argued that he was therefore unfit to practice. Under the National Law, a finding of Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct is made where a Practitioner practises in a manner that is below the standard expected, or acts improperly or unethically. Where Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct is deemed "sufficiently serious", as was the Practitioner's actions in this case, a finding of Professional Misconduct may follow. Such a finding would form the basis to justify suspension or cancellation of the Practitioner's registration.

The HCCC submitted to the Tribunal that the Practitioner's conduct breached the professional boundaries that must exist between himself and a patient. Consequently, this serves to undermine public trust in the profession. The Practitioner continued to deny any sexual intent towards the patient during his treatment, maintaining his position that any contact he had with the patient was incidental and accidental. Further, he claimed that his reference to a "happy ending" was a joke and not intended to have sexual connotation.

The Tribunal's decision that the conduct was deliberate

In making its decision, the Tribunal was not bound by the findings in the criminal proceeding. The Tribunal was required to consider the evidence put before it and exercise its own judgment, with the objective of protecting the public.

The Tribunal had to consider whether the Practitioner was behaving appropriately during his treatment of the patient. The factors that concerned the Tribunal were that it was uncommon for the Practitioner to perform remedial massage, that he carried out this treatment on the patient for longer in duration than would be considered usual and that he did so late in the evening when he was alone at the practice.

In light of this, the Tribunal determined that the Practitioner’s conduct towards the patient was deliberate and sexually motivated. It was satisfied that the evidence, which had also been tested at the Magistrate’s Court and before the Chiropractic Council, proved this. The Tribunal stated that the Practitioner's behaviour was completely improper. The conduct required a serious message to be sent to the Practitioner and all of those in the professions who are required to come directly into contact with patient's bodies.

Chiropractor found guilty of Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct and Professional Misconduct

The Tribunal found the Practitioner guilty of both Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct and Professional Misconduct. The Practitioner's registration was cancelled and he was prohibited from seeking registration for 12 months. This was less than what the HCCC had asked the Tribunal to impose.

The Tribunal also strongly recommended that that the Practitioner consult a psychologist to address his lack of insight, undertake mentoring from a senior chiropractor, and participate in professional development, addressing amongst other things, anatomy and professional communication.

Lessons for medical practitioners

The Practitioner in this case now has a criminal record, and is deregistered and listed on the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency's register of cancelled Health Practitioners. This case serves as a reminder that the consequences of grave misconduct can be far reaching and severe.

All information on this site is of a general nature only and is not intended to be relied upon as, nor to be a substitute for, specific legal professional advice. No responsibility for the loss occasioned to any person acting on or refraining from action as a result of any material published can be accepted.

Key
Contacts

Brighid Ervin

Brighid Ervin

Lawyer