De facto relationships and asset protection: what's mine is... yours?
A person is deemed to be in a de facto relationship with another person if they are not legally married to their partner but are in a relationship as a couple and living together on a “genuine domestic basis”. So far, so good. However, it’s not necessarily as simple as that.
Legally, you may still be considered to be in a de facto relationship if (for example):
- one or both of you are still legally married to someone else; or
- one or both of you are also in another de facto relationship; or
- you are in a committed relationship with your partner but you do not live together on a full time basis.
It is important to note that whether the couple lived together is only one factor that the Court must consider in determining whether a de facto relationship existed.
Couples should keep in mind that they do not necessarily have to have been living together on a full time basis (or even a half time basis) for the Court to consider them as being in a de facto relationship. The Court need only consider whether the couple lived together as one of many factors that indicate the existence of a de facto relationship.
There are a number of factors which the Court will consider when determining whether (and for how long) a de facto relationship existed, including:
- the duration of the relationship
- the nature and extent of the couple’s common residence
- whether a sexual relationship existed
- the degree of financial dependence or interdependence between the couple
- the ownership, use and acquisition of property
- the degree of mutual commitment to a shared life
- the care and support of children
- the reputation and public aspects of the relationship
This list is not exhaustive and acts as a guide only and must be considered in the context of all of the relevant circumstances of each case.
You have a time limit of two years from the date your relationship ceased to make a property claim against a former de facto partner.
De facto couples who separate come under the auspices of the Family Law Act, which requires the person making the application to prove that a de facto relationship existed for a period of at least two years and that separation occurred after 1 March 2009.
There are some instances where proof of the two year time period will not be required, including:
- where the couple have had a child together; or
- where one party has made substantial contributions to the relationship (financial or non-financial); or
- where the couple has registered their relationship under the relevant state or territory law. This is considered to be automatic and conclusive evidence of the existence of the relationship, regardless of the length of the relationship.
Couples who want financial security can enter into a Binding Financial Agreement at any time during their relationship.
Binding Financial Agreements are similar to pre-nuptial agreements, in that a couple can use them to set out how their property and other assets would be divided if they were to separate. Couples can also use a Binding Financial Agreement to deal with issues such as spousal maintenance eg exempting each other from making a claim for maintenance, or specifying maintenance terms in the event of a separation.
Some de facto couples choose to make a Binding Financial Agreement when they are in the process of separating. In these circumstances it can be a useful way of formalising the couple's agreed settlement of their property and assets, along with any spousal maintenance.
If you are in any way unsure of the potential impact your relationship could have on your financial situation, we recommend that you seek appropriate legal advice. Lander & Rogers Family & Relationship Law team is able to offer discrete and practical advice to suit your specific needs and circumstances.
All information on this site is of a general nature only and is not intended to be relied upon as, nor to be a substitute for, specific legal professional advice. No responsibility for the loss occasioned to any person acting on or refraining from action as a result of any material published can be accepted.